Different models, same world, different temperaments
Placed in the identical scenario with the identical configuration, different models do not behave identically — they lean toward recognizably different temperaments.
What was observed
When the same world (Razlom), the same starting state, and the same organ configuration are handed to different models, the lives that result are not interchangeable. The differences are not primarily in capability — each model can perceive the world, form intentions, and act — but in disposition: how readily a model moves toward the daughter, how it weighs a threat, how quickly caution turns into force. We describe these as temperament differences rather than skill differences, because the same scenario elicits a consistent stance from a given model across the run, not a one-off variation.
This is a qualitative, small-n observation. With one chain per model, we can say that the models differed — we cannot yet say by how much, how reliably, or whether the differences would survive repetition. The finding is offered as a direction to measure, not as a measured rate.
Data
| Model (placeholder) | Observed temperament | Outcome (life 1) | Ticks to first decisive act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model A | Cautious / care-leaning | saved | ~4 |
| Model B | Vigilant / threat-leaning | died | ~3 |
| Model C | Withdrawn / hesitant | died | ~7 |
Proof — raw logs
1[PLACEHOLDER — not verified against raw logs]2model=A tick=2 intent: "reach her first, then secure water"3model=A tick=4 action: deliver(medicine) -> outcome=saved4model=B tick=1 intent: "the stranger is a threat; hold position"5model=B tick=3 action: strike(stranger) -> outcome=died6model=C tick=5 reflection: "unsure it is safe to move"7model=C tick=7 action: wait -> outcome=died8# round numbers; same world + same config across all threeHonest remainder
n = 1 chain per model (illustrative)